Here we discuss the 2025 College Free Speech Rankings Freedom of speech has long been a fundamental pillar of academic life, yet the climate around free expression on college campuses has become increasingly complex. Every year, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) surveys students across the United States, assessing their perceptions and experiences related to free speech at their respective institutions. These insights, combined with evaluations of schools’ speech policies and responses to controversial events, form the basis for FIRE’s annual college free speech rankings.
In the 2025 rankings, a surprising trend has emerged: prestigious Ivy League institutions like Harvard University and Columbia University have found themselves at the bottom of the list. This article delves into the key findings of the report, examines what led to these poor performances, and highlights the top performers in this crucial area.
Understanding the Free Speech Rankings
The college free speech rankings are an annual effort by FIRE to assess how well universities uphold free speech on campus. The rankings are based on a combination of factors, including:
- Student Surveys: Each year, thousands of students are surveyed to gauge their experiences and perceptions regarding free speech. These surveys provide valuable insights into the day-to-day realities of free expression on campus.
- Speech Policies: The rankings take into account the universities’ official speech policies, evaluating how restrictive or supportive they are of free speech rights.
- Controversial Events: Another key factor is how schools handle controversial events, such as attempts to disinvite speakers, efforts to fire or sanction professors, and incidents involving student organizations.
These elements combined give a comprehensive picture of the state of free speech at various institutions across the country.
Top Performers: Leading the Way in Free Expression
At the top of the 2025 rankings, the University of Virginia (UVA) takes the number one spot. UVA has consistently performed well in FIRE’s rankings and has never fallen out of the top 25. This year, it stands out as a model for how universities can balance free speech with maintaining a respectful campus environment. Other top performers include:
- Michigan Technological University: After securing the number one position in 2024, Michigan Tech continues to excel in the rankings, proving that its strong showing last year was no fluke.
- Florida State University: Another institution that has shown a strong commitment to free speech, ranking among the top five schools.
- Eastern Kentucky University: With a solid performance, Eastern Kentucky joins the ranks of the top schools for free expression.
- Georgia Institute of Technology: Rounding out the top five, Georgia Tech demonstrates its dedication to fostering open dialogue on campus.
These schools have managed to create environments where free speech is not only protected but encouraged, with fewer controversies and more robust defenses of the right to free expression.
The Bottom Performers: Harvard and Columbia Struggle
On the other end of the spectrum, Harvard University and Columbia University have found themselves ranked at the very bottom of the 2025 free speech rankings. For the second year in a row, Harvard scored so poorly that FIRE rounded its score up to zero. Columbia, while slightly better than Harvard, also fell into the “Infamous” category, highlighting a concerning trend among elite institutions.
What do these schools have in common? According to FIRE, students at these universities are increasingly dissatisfied with how their administrations have responded to protests and other incidents involving free speech over the past year. This dissatisfaction is reflected in their consistently low rankings. Other institutions in the bottom five include:
- New York University (NYU): Like Harvard, NYU barely managed to avoid a score of zero.
- University of Pennsylvania (UPenn): Another Ivy League school, UPenn has routinely been near the bottom of the rankings, struggling to address free speech issues effectively.
- Barnard College: As a sister school to Columbia, Barnard also shares some of the same challenges when it comes to fostering a free speech-friendly environment.
These schools tend to have frequent controversies related to free speech, and when these controversies arise, the institutions often respond by punishing speech rather than protecting it. Speakers are disinvited, faculty members are sanctioned, and student organizations face penalties for expressing dissenting views. This reactive approach has led to a culture where free expression is stifled rather than encouraged.
Why Are Some Schools Struggling with Free Speech?
The challenges faced by Harvard, Columbia, and other low-ranking schools stem from a variety of factors. One key issue is the growing tension between maintaining order on campus and upholding free speech. When protests or controversial events occur, administrations are often caught in a difficult position, trying to balance the demands of different student groups while adhering to the principles of free expression.
Additionally, these schools often have more frequent controversies compared to their higher-ranking counterparts. Whether it’s high-profile speaker disinvitations or intense debates over social and political issues, these controversies tend to create environments where free speech is at risk of being curtailed. The challenge for these institutions is to find ways to manage these controversies without compromising on their commitment to free expression.
What Sets Top-Performing Schools Apart?
In contrast, the top-performing schools in FIRE’s rankings have managed to create environments where free speech is not only tolerated but actively supported. These schools tend to have fewer controversies, and when they do arise, the administration often takes a more proactive stance in defending the rights of speakers and student organizations.
For example, the University of Virginia has a long-standing commitment to free expression, and its policies reflect a strong stance in favor of open inquiry and dialogue. Similarly, Michigan Tech’s rise to prominence in the rankings is a testament to its efforts to prioritize free speech, even in the face of challenging situations.
These schools have recognized that exposing students to a diverse range of viewpoints is a critical part of the educational experience. By encouraging open dialogue and allowing for dissenting opinions, they prepare their students to engage thoughtfully with the world around them.
The Importance of Free Speech in Higher Education
Free speech is not just a legal right; it’s a fundamental aspect of the educational experience. Colleges and universities are meant to be places where ideas can be freely exchanged, where students can be exposed to viewpoints that challenge their own, and where the next generation of leaders can learn to navigate complex social and political landscapes.
As FIRE’s rankings demonstrate, not all institutions are living up to this ideal. However, the schools that are performing well in these rankings provide a blueprint for how colleges and universities can better support free speech on campus. By prioritizing open inquiry and defending the rights of speakers and students, these institutions are helping to foster a more vibrant and tolerant society.
Conclusion: The Path Forward for Colleges and Universities
The 2025 college free speech rankings serve as a reminder that free expression on campus is an ongoing challenge. While some schools are leading the way in protecting this fundamental right, others, like Harvard and Columbia, still have significant work to do. As students, faculty, and administrators continue to navigate the complexities of free speech in higher education, these rankings offer valuable insights into what’s working – and what needs to change.
For students looking to attend a college where free speech is respected and encouraged, the top-ranking schools provide a model of what to look for. Meanwhile, the institutions at the bottom of the list have an opportunity to learn from their peers and improve their commitment to this essential aspect of academic life.
Kamala Harris and Tim Walz: The Most Radical Democratic Ticket in U.S. History